Subscribe Today! Please read: Readers of local content on the Herald and News website – heraldandnews.com – will require a subscription beginning today. For the first few months, non-subscribers will still be able to view 10 articles for free. If you are not already a subscriber, now is a great time to join for as little as $10/month!

If Oregon economists’ predictions hold, taxpayers will receive up to $724 million worth of “kicker” rebates when they file their income taxes in 2020. But momentum is building to end the only-in-Oregon approach of issuing such rebates in order to build reserves for schools.

Right now, the median Oregonian with roughly $36,000 a year in adjusted gross income can expect a tax credit of about $175 in 2020, according to the most recent state revenue forecast in November.

But it’s possible voters will decide to instead send the money to a rainy day fund for schools that the state could tap during economic downturns.

Business leaders who gathered in Portland on Monday said polling showed more than 60 percent of respondents would support such a change. Jeremy Rogers, vice president of the Oregon Business Council, told attendees at the Oregon Leadership Summit that lawmakers could refer the question to voters in the May 2019 election, if they act quickly.

It was the latest sign that the idea is gaining momentum, six years after voters approved ending the kicker rebate on corporate taxes.

Republican candidate for governor Knute Buehler, a lawmaker and orthopedic surgeon from Bend, expressed support for ending the personal income tax kicker in an interview with The Oregonian/OregonLive editorial board in October.

“I would be willing to support, and have said so in the past, diversion of the kicker into a rainy-day fund until it’s built up adequately: about 20 percent of the general fund budget or $4 billion, that could be drawn upon to smooth out that revenue cycle,” Buehler said.

In the same interview, Brown didn’t say whether she supported ending the kicker. Instead, she noted the state was on track to end the current budget with a rainy day fund that would cover just 9 percent of the general fund budget.

“Is it adequate? It’s ok,” Brown said.

It’s unclear whether the governor has taken a position on kicker changes since then. Her communications director, Chris Pair, did not respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.

Under Oregon’s Constitution, the unique kicker tax rebate is triggered when tax revenues for a two-year budget cycle come in more than 2 percent above economists’ forecast from the start of the cycle.

Buehler was not the first Republican to discuss changes to the kicker this year. In June, Sen. Tim Knopp, also from Bend, said he expected fellow lawmakers would consider trimming or scrapping it as they look to raise tax revenue next year. As a state representative, Knopp referred a measure to voters that enshrined the kicker in Oregon’s Constitution.

One of the Oregon kicker’s fiercest defenders says he expects lawmakers will consider changing or eliminating the state’s unique tax refund law as they search for revenue next year.

One question heading into the legislative session is how high a priority it will be for Democrats to change the kicker, as they aim to pass major climate change legislation and raise billions in fees and taxes to fund Medicaid and education.

Sen. Mark Hass, D-Beaverton, is chair of the Oregon Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue. On Tuesday, he expressed support for the idea of ending the kicker.

“I would love to redirect it to the rainy-day fund,” Hass said on Tuesday, noting that Oregon’s dependence on income taxes exposes the state to wild fluctuations in revenue. “The next best thing to a major structural reform … is to have a strong rainy-day fund to cushion the inevitable downturns we have. It’s poor public policy to begin with.”

Hass did say that redirecting the kicker to an education savings fund is a lower priority for him compared with getting a major tax increase through the Legislature. Brown has challenged lawmakers to raise $2 billion worth of taxes in the 2019 session, roughly the same amount House Speaker Tina Kotek unsuccessfully pushed for lawmakers to raise in 2017.