Subscribe Today! Please read: Readers of local content on the Herald and News website – heraldandnews.com – will require a subscription beginning today. For the first few months, non-subscribers will still be able to view 10 articles for free. If you are not already a subscriber, now is a great time to join for as little as $10/month!

AT&T faces a lawsuit in federal court after promoting what some rivals and consumers have derided as “fake 5G” technology.

The suit, filed by Sprint late Thursday night, accuses AT&T of marketing that “deceives consumers” into thinking AT&T already offers a next-generation, 5G wireless network when in fact customers are still using an upgraded version of 4G LTE.

“The significance of AT&T’s deception cannot be overstated,” Sprint said in its complaint, adding that AT&T’s promotional effort has resulted in lost sales for Sprint and risks confusing the public. AT&T didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

AT&T in recent weeks has begun replacing the “LTE” symbol at the top of some smartphones with a new icon that says “5G E,” which stands for “5G Evolution.” The company has said the label reflects the fact that AT&T is on the pathway to rolling out a mainstream 5G network, which could eventually support download speeds up to 100 times faster than the current standard.

But AT&T has yet to switch on such a network for smartphones, prompting Verizon, T-Mobile and Sprint to pile on with tweets, full-page ads in print media and other statements condemning the rhetoric. All four companies are racing against each other to field the nation’s first true 5G wireless network, and in its lawsuit, Sprint said AT&T is trying to gain an “unfair advantage” with its allegedly misleading marketing.

At the Consumer Electronics Show in January, John Donovan, the chief executive of AT&T Communications, defended the practice.

“If I now occupy beachfront real estate in our competitors’ heads, that makes me smile,” he said. “Every company is guilty of building a narrative of how you want the world to work. And I love the fact that we broke our industry’s narrative two days ago, and they’re frustrated and gonna do what they’re gonna do.”

Sprint’s complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Gerry OBrien, Editor