Subscribe Today! Please read: Readers of local content on the Herald and News website – heraldandnews.com – will require a subscription beginning today. For the first few months, non-subscribers will still be able to view 10 articles for free. If you are not already a subscriber, now is a great time to join for as little as $10/month!

Congressman Greg Walden wasn’t shy about his thoughts on border security and the wall on the border between the United States and Mexico during a town hall in Klamath Falls on Friday, where he discussed recently casting a vote outside Republican Party lines to end the partial shutdown of the federal government.

The Hood River Republican specifically took issue, though, with the furlough of employees of the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, Bureau of Land Management, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

“I’ve cited the Klamath Basin and the Biological Opinion as one of the things that got delayed (in the) course of these discussions,” Walden said.

Walden wants to exempt agencies funded by Department of Interior, Agriculture, and Fish and Wildlife from the shutdown.

“Why inflict all this?” he said. “I didn’t sign up for this kind of shutdown,” Walden added.

During the town hall, which drew about 150 people to Oregon Tech, he called the vote a bit of a “break” with party lines, a comment met with applause from some in the audience.

“I don’t know what a BLM worker in Vale or a Forest Service worker in John Day or Fish and Wildlife down here has to do with this debate that’s going on in Washington right now,” Walden said. “I also very much support getting border security in place.”

Walden said he asked for his pay to be with held during the shutdown out of solidarity for federal workers furloughed.

“I told Mrs. Walden a couple days later,” he noted.

“We need to work through this, the people that make the decisions — Nancy Pelosi and Donald Trump and Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell — need to get in a big room and work this out.”

But when it comes to the wall, the concept isn’t new to Walden, or he said, many other politicians.

“What the president is actually proposing is a wall, it is a fence, it is a added border security, it’s the whole thing,” Walden said. “He wraps it around the term wall, but really what it is is much more than that. It’s much more than that. It’s repairing fencing, it’s building new border security, some sort of wall. It is all these other security measures and I do support that.”

Walden called out U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., as having voted for a “wall” — “It was called a fence in 2006,” Walden said.

That fence references House Resolution 6061, known as the Secure Fence Act of 2006.

“Most of it’s been built,” Walden said. “There are walls, there’s fencing, some is high tech,” he added. “They put up the wall in San Diego, they put up the wall in El Paso, and they put up solid border protection in Arizona.”

“We’re actually rebuilding fencing that needs to be redone and some of old wall that needs to be redone,” he said.

“The fight is over the Homeland Security appropriations bill that contains the funding for the wall and border security.”

For Walden, it’s a holding pattern until 60 votes can be found to move the bill in the Senate.

“The president said he’ll veto until they get a resolution on border funding,” Walden said.

Walden also touched on other national issues, such as elections, in response to Michael Fitzgerald’s question.

“We don’t need other governments — Russia — involved in our elections, or the way we conduct our public process,” Walden said. “We need to be able to have faith in our electoral process.”

He responded to Leslie Lowe’s questions of whether he would change his votes on issues, such as immigration by saying: “I don’t support open borders … I do support border security.”

Water Infrastructure Act

Walden also addressed drought relief funding allocated in the America’s Water Infrastructure Act (AWIA).

“It’s authorized $10 million for each of the next four years, if necessary,” he said.

“You would have to fund it but then it’s already authorized. You can’t fund something if you don’t know if you’re going to need it. Part of what we ran into was we needed that authorization.”

Walden said funding for drought relief would likely be found in a disaster bill in 2019, if needed, which can cover wildfires, floods, hurricanes, tornadoes and drought.

“In the context of that, we can say, this is already authorized,” he said. “It’s emergency funding for emergency situations.”

The Klamath Project Drought Response Agency (KPDRA), which is set to distribute more than $9 million in federal drought relief to irrigators, was set to dissolve in June.

The agency will have approximately $1.5 million left over and, if it remains an organization, could oversee transfer of funding from AWIA, according to Walden’s staff.

On-Project irrigator and farmer Rob Unruh addressed declining levels of farmers in the Project, despite welcomed federal aid spearheaded by Walden.

“We’ve got to look at something different,” Unruh said. “We need your help and we need to fix the problem.”

Walden said he’s not worked on an issue that’s “more vexing” and “more elusive” than trying to come to a long-term solution over ongoing water conflicts in the Klamath Basin.

“There’s so many legal issues, treaty issues, political issues,” Walden said. “I’m open to working with anybody. I still believe there’s a way through this.”

Forest management

Walden also addressed wildfires in 2018 and expressed dissatisfaction with how they’ve been handled.

“I pushed hard in the last Congress to get more authorities that are proven and work to reduce the fuel loads in our forests,” Walden said.

Walden said a prior Farm Bill had included authority for “thinning” of forests but it was up to governors of states to decide which forests to conduct thinning. He hopes to gain authority to allow thinning in all areas of the district.

Kingsley updates

Walden also waxed hopeful that a visit by Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson to Kingsley Field late last year could mean big things for Air National Guard base in the future.

“I am hopeful as a result of that visit that we can move forward and have a flying mission out of here that keeps that base at its full capacity or more,” Walden said. “Whether that’s F-35s or the F-15-e’s, or other type of training of aircraft, I think we’re in a little better position.”