Charter and local measures results
Updated 10:15 p.m.: Charter local bonds, levies failing
-- Home rule charter measure was failing, 64 percent to 36 percent (10,427 to 5,987 votes)
-- Klamath Communtiy College bond was failing, 57 percent to 43 percent (9,468 to 7,210 votes)
-- 911 levy was failing, 56 to 38 percent (10,255 to 6,952 votes)
-- Klamath County Fire District No. 1 levy was failing, 62 to 38 percent (7,035 to 4,279 votes)
As of 10:15 p.m. with 46 percent of all ballots counted:
-- Home rule charter measure was failing, 57 percent to 33 percent (9,365 to 5,469 votes)
-- Klamath Communtiy College bond was failing, 54 percent to 41 percent (8,478 to 6,546 votes)
-- 911 levy was failing, 56 to 38 percent (9,262 to 6,307 votes)
-- Klamath County Fire District No. 1 levy was failing, 57 to 35 percent (6,262 to 3,848 votes)
![]() |
||
| Right-of-way feud solved |
Reader Comments
VW Bug wrote on Nov 7, 2008 10:07 PM:
Now that is just me... times that by all the homeowners in Kfalls and the various amounts they have to pay for those same services... Well, I would like to know what they are doing with all that money they get? Besides giving a $30k raise to the director of 911...
I am not rich and I am not selfish for wanting to make sure I can put another meal on my table instead of buying just one more pizza for Klamath (That is my favorite line... it is just one pizza a year...I am up to 100 pizza's).
I love Klamath, but I want to know where my money is going... I am sure paying it out, but no-one can tell me where it is going. "
ill wrote on Nov 7, 2008 4:10 PM:
Wow..those are some sour grapes for sure! I live in one of those broke down houses...I have a newer vehicle..1 year old jet ski..eat steak 2 times a week..and voted NO..and I feel great about it! everytime I chew a bite of red meat i thank everyone else that voted no..I will not compromise what you consider to be a less that honorable life style so that people in city/county offices can abuse my tax dollars anymore than they already do...here's to me and my redneck life style..gonna have me a steak tonight and go look at my yet to be paid for jet ski that will sit in my garage for the next 7 months and not get used..here's something else..the voting power of the poor out weighed the voting power of those with the sivler spoons in their mouths. HA! "
Belko wrote on Nov 7, 2008 3:57 PM:
Yes the dispatchers are union, that sure says a lot for thier union doesn't it. Also, budget documents do not lie. 2004-2005 dispatchers made 40,400 per year, 2008-09, it's budgeted for 41100. You do the math.
As far as the other adminstrative position. Yes, it was half time, so lets double her hours and TRIPLE her wages.
70,000 dollars in raises alone for 3 administrative positions at 911. $700 for the dispatchers.
Get rid of the administration, and I will think about voting yes. "
Marie wrote on Nov 7, 2008 12:43 PM:
Do You Really Think wrote on Nov 7, 2008 12:21 PM:
OK wrote on Nov 7, 2008 11:18 AM:
Old and Broke wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:48 PM:
If it were the fire only, i would have voted yes. These people seemed to use what they had before they came to voters.
I will never vote for 911 until they can account for every dollar they get already. *I* cant afford to waste any money on anything, neither can they.
KCC is important, however they charge tuition. They already get public tax money. Why is it the FIRST place they go to get more money is voters? Why cant they do fund raising and other such things to gain money. Even if they fell short i would be more liable to approve a levy if they did everything they could to get money on their own FIRST. "
Good Job wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:25 PM:
Some of these posts are down right vile. They state how stupid we are, and how ignorant we are, how "back woodsy" we are. Plus many, many more attacks on us.
I am assuming that these are people that supported 911 and the Fire Department measures, and are mad at us for voicing our opinion.
I encourage all of you to remember these vile posts when they ask us to vote again. 911 can't take no as an answer, so I'm sure they will try something, but think about how these people feel about you next time they ask you to vote for these measures.
Klamath County is the best in the State, and obviously people are mad because we could see throught the smoke screen 911 was trying to project.
Good Job Klamath "
Belko wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:17 PM:
As far as 911, when 3 administrators including the director gets nearly 70,000.00 in raises in just 3 years, and the dispatchers only get 700, you tell me if that is proper management of our money.
I will vote yes again on KCC, I will vote yes of the FD if they specify what they need the money for, but no way in you know what will I ever, ever vote for 911 until they get new management and stop spending OUR money WE already give them on these 3 people.
So "Interested Party", you need to get your facts before you want to give our money away. Giving money to 911 with this administration is like putting it right in the toilet and flushing it. Please educate yourself with the facts before you vote yes. "
Single mom wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:30 PM:
Interested Party wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:02 PM:
Dave wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:51 AM:
mick wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:35 AM:
pete wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:26 AM:
Chris wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:43 AM:
To those that posted "respectful, here's how I feel" messages, thank you. And to those that posted the idiotic comments claiming to have all the answers, with none of the respect, learn a little more about respect and communicating.
As far as KCC; as a homeowner, why should I pay? Shouldn't that be wrapped up in tuition and fees? I am all for education... at the cost of those seeking it. I already pay for my children to go to public schools even though they are homeschooled, now you want me to pay for a community college?
As goes the fire and 911 levy, I voted yes. It was after the fact that I was told of the mismanagement of both, where is the press on that? I can read about a right-of-way dispute, but nothing about emergency management meltdown? Both sides had a weak argument as I heard very little, but in the end, public safety will have my vote until persuaded otherwise.
In regards to the comment made about sales tax, geat point! I have always wondered how renter can vote to raise my property taxes with little to no effect on them. Yeah, their landlord may raise their rent sightly, but how about you take a peak at my property tax that always seems to sneak up when I least expect it...
Many good comments on here, every day we get stronger and better, as individuals and a community. Let's put our heads together to fix the problems at hand, without blank checks, and hold structured accountability.
And again, blasting other people on their positions (no matter which side) will not help in the least, it just makes you sound plain ignorant... "
The Llama wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:51 AM:
Decades wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:31 PM:
It may interest you to know that that combat pay will be excluded when "income" is looked at when qualifyng for food stamps. Yes, many hundreds of active duty familes are eligible.
There are abuses in any government programs, but those are the exceptions and not the norm. There are at least 1000 farmers and ranchers in this county who has gotten sudsidies (handouts? welfare?) and up to $450, 000 in cost-share assistance from the government -- what other businesses have gotten things like this? Would you be wiling to stop these payments or demand drug testing also?
Let's look at what President elect Obama asks of us, "...let us summon a new spirit of patriotism, of responsibility, where each of us resolves to pitch in and work harder and look after not only ourselves but each other." "
Fabulous wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:24 PM:
Lee wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:10 PM:
mds wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:55 PM:
Interested Party wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:13 PM:
Disappointed wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:02 PM:
Robert wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:00 PM:
Get a Clue wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:30 PM:
craig wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:27 PM:
Get A Clue wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:55 PM:
Julie wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:48 PM:
It is not about the money, it is about the way the money has been spent. I would have gladly voted yes if 911 had a board of directors and a director that could manage the money. There was a letter to the editor recently that showed how much the directors wages have increased over 3 years, do you think that is good management?
The only reason I voted no on the Fire Department, was they never did tell us what it would be used for.
911 will never get a vote from me until it is under different management, but I would be willing to vote for the fire department if they were a little more proactive in getting information out. "
Grammy wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:17 PM:
DD wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:05 PM:
Joe wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:18 PM:
Going to Die wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:23 AM:
Stop giving huge raises to administration, and put the money where it's needed.
Services are not going to cease to exist, because yes, they are mandated, and we already pay taxes to both of these agencies. Both of these agencies get a 3% increase every year which is more than I get on my paycheck.
Work with what you get, this isn't Wall Street, don't ask for a bail out. "
a tad mad wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:16 AM:
Paul wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:39 AM:
If you would look, you would see that there are many viable options to finance our community. Lets have a local sales tax in county and be done with it. "
Sorry to Public Service wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:35 AM:
Show some responsibility wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:30 AM:
As far as the 911 and Fire District #1 levies are concerned, the governing boards and administrators need to demonstrate a responsiblity with the funds that they currently receive before many in this community want to give them even more to throw away. I am not disappointed or worried about the failure of these levies.
The 911 office cried that they needed a 5 year 10 million dollar levy can't live without it or services will have to be cut and what do they do.....find the funding for many of the equipment items that they couldn't live without and come right back with another levy saying they can't live without this amount of money. Go back to your drawing board and try again. You receive money from the state for call taking service that you provide to the citizens of Klamath County that come from their phone bills and you have a service district to pay for the dispatching services that you provide to the user agencies. Work within your means. Make some cuts....How many supervisors do you have and how many plan jane workers do you have? Isn't there 1 supervisor for less than every 2 workers? hmmmmm
Fire Department....figure out what you need the money for before you really come back to the voters. To back fill your "savings" account doesn't cut it with many people. Show us some better accountability.
Just because they provide vital public service doesn't mean that they provide good public accountability. "
Discouraged wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:23 AM:
What wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:13 AM:
KCC wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:08 AM:
JEnnifer wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:00 AM:
Hol wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:38 AM:
Lynn wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:21 AM:
Going to die wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:52 AM:
I sure hope I don't die because I voted no before I move. Aagghhh "
Distant observer wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:40 AM:
Attention wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:13 AM:
Thank you Klamath Falls. You deserve each other.
Enjoy the increased drug use, poor education, and decreased rescue assistance. Don't worry, it won't cost you a dime! "
BM wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:06 AM:
snoopy wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:03 AM:
Ready To Leave wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:38 AM:
karho wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:33 AM:
Roxanne wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:19 AM:
Oh well wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:09 AM:
I'm glad that the charter government failed.
As far as the levies go, if the citizens could see that the taxes they are already paying were being spent responsibly then they might vote for some of the increases.
When times are tough, us citizens need to tighten our belts and do with less. Why doesn't the government have to suffer through hard times like the rest of us? "
disappointed wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:39 AM:
nice try but no cigar wrote on Nov 5, 2008 3:12 AM:
Bee wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:58 AM:
t dog wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:51 AM:
plute wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:45 PM:
If you like the lack of jobs, the poor economy, the high crime rate, the rampant drug use, the ,bickering government leaders, please continue to vote republican! "
Bothered wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:00 PM:
Jack R wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:18 PM:
I'll tell you something you should know already, there are a lot of us who'll continue to vote "NO!" until we see change in how the current and now the re-elected administrations account for the money.
We all have to tighten our belts, so do they! I refuse to add more money so people can give themselves pay raises or hire more people with out thought.
There has to be a accountability of service to the public before requesting more and more. "
Frustrated Resident wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:08 PM:
kanton wrote on Nov 4, 2008 9:42 PM:
Dissagree wrote on Nov 4, 2008 9:36 PM:
Interested party wrote on Nov 4, 2008 9:00 PM:





Think smart wrote on Nov 9, 2008 3:26 PM: