Local Surveys

  • Ask the candidates

    What questions do you want to ask candidates for national, state and local races? Let us know by taking our survey.
  • Financial crisis survey

    How is the government handling the current financial crisis? Let us know what you think.

Blogs

Today's Front Page

E-edition Login:
Login:
Password:

Community News

"Photos and news submitted by
our readers."
Web site Index
Home Index Classifieds Basin Directory
Herald and News
Klamath Falls, Oregon • 800-275-0982 Make Us Your Home Page

Archives > Viewpoints > Letters

Print Version | Email this story | Comment (11 comment(s)) | Text Size

Look at the facts of Klamath dams

Saturday, September 27, 2008 11:56 PM PDT
Sometimes we get so involved with legal and political issues we forget to look at the facts on the ground. This water debate sure seems to fit this profile. Here are some real facts:

The dams on the Klamath River:



  • Store a lot of water.


  • Provide a lot of green power at low cost.


  • Allow flood control and management of water in general.


  • With fish ladders installed, would allow for fish runs and habitat. So why would we blow these up?




The only advantage I can see for this expensive procedure would be to enhance fish runs, but in fact, if the money is spent on fish ladders, we can have the fish anyway. Why not have it all?

It seems to be that too much say is given over to Indian tribes and not enough to the general public’s welfare. Perhaps this is due to a lot of cash sloshing around from casinos or perhaps it is due to legal maneuvers and tactics, but the facts on the ground are for keeping the dams, not blowing them up. Electric rates will zoom if these dams are removed.

Take the money that would be used for demolition and for building the next bunch of coal-burning power plants (very un-green) and use it instead for fish ladders.

Also the money spent so far on lawyers’ fees and legal hassles would have probably paid for the fish ladders.

    Corrine Edwards

    Klamath Falls



Previous   Next
County teachers seeking fair wage   Obama doesn’t understand things

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of HeraldAndNews.com. Comment Disclaimer: The editors of heraldandnews.com reserve the right to refuse publication of any comment posted for consideration. We may refuse for any reason, including use of profanity, disparaging comments, libelous comments, etc. Any reader who notices a comment they believe is particularly offensive, should notify us at webmaster@heraldandnews.com.

joe wrote on Oct 2, 2008 7:18 AM:

" The dams pollute the water with massive growths of toxic algae. The dams kill off the salmon which is a big, big economic loss to commercial and sport fishing industry. Geothermal is here and is increasing [plant being built on Lower Klamath Road.] Remove the dams, restore salmon and recreation economic development and replace dams with true clean geothermal energy. Save the rate payers money over the cost of fish ladders that, no doubt, will have problems passing all species [like the Columbia River dams do not adequately pass adequate numbers of eels so eels appear to be headed for the endangered species list.] "

C. Delux wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:20 PM:

" Right On Ben!!! Poor misguided Rick...
Hey Rick, when was the last time you went swimming in Klamath Lake...I think I was in it in 1972...still came out with green stuff all over me... "

Ben wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:06 AM:

" As Truth said, the Indian (or Native American, whatever) Nations are sovereign, and rightfully so. If the state decided to build a toxic waste dump next to your house, would you buy the argument that you had been "given" too much safety from poison? After all, without the waste, the general public wouldn't have it's power, it's vehicle, or it's international food supply.
Read this article by Pacificorp's parent company (http://www.berkshireshareholders.com/Documents/Klamath-Dams-Agency-Factsheet.pdf), which points out that removing the dams would be cheaper than building fish ladders. And (look it up) the dams provide less than 1% of Pacificorp's electricity and is sold to us at retail rates.
Ah, how objectivity and "facts" can be used so subjectively.
Don't forget that Salmon are dying off, and that by restoring Salmon to the Klamath (which have declined by 90%) we would increase local food supplies, and communities all along it will probably make more money. We can learn a lot about living on this earth from the "aboriginals."
Truth, the localist needs you. Please find us. Out in '09. "

KS wrote on Sep 30, 2008 10:51 AM:

" This uis an offensive piece. If you cannot see the value of removal and you think only tribes lead the effort, yoo are not paying attention. If you think the dams provide "green" power, you have not seen the river below them choked with solid wastes in the form of toxic cyanobacteria. "

Rick M wrote on Sep 30, 2008 5:46 AM:

" Nothing stated was hate speech!

I dont use the incorrect term "indian". We dont live in India! Columbus incorrectly thought he had landed in India and incorrectly labeled the native aboriginals as indians. The continents werent labeled North and South America until much later.

Where is the hate in being correct? Your "looking for hate", when it isnt there!

Have a good day! "

Decades wrote on Sep 29, 2008 9:45 PM:

" "Decades... your responce is a standard aboriginal one."

One that recognises hate speech?

I pay my own power bills. I work to pay them. Like everyone else. "

C. Delux wrote on Sep 29, 2008 6:09 PM:

" Isn't that the question - pay for fish ladders or tear down the dams? Either way it will cost. Too bad that the fish ladders were not installed when the dams were built...like it said in the treaty...pick your poison "

Rick M wrote on Sep 29, 2008 5:08 PM:

" Decades... your responce is a standard aboriginal one.

I guess you wont be happy until the rivers have flowed free with all the water having gone down stream (then dry in summer months).

Are your power bills paid for by those same aboriginal tribes?? "

Truth wrote on Sep 29, 2008 2:46 PM:

" 'too much say is given over to Indian tribes...'---lookup Sovereignty. Nothing is given.

If you are worried about the general public, figure out why 5% of the population controls 80% of the wealth. The greedy people that control that company see $$, not people. It costs more to install ladders then tearing them down. So, he ain't considering those ladders because there's no profit and tearing them down is cheaper. This means they lose less.

The people that have too much say are the wealthy. Some tribes have casino money because the profits are large. Klamath Indians are not one of those tribes. We are not all the same.

FYI: The 'SAY' you worry the Indians have too much of, is owned by the wealthy.

Don't go accusing Indians for this problem, again. Tulelake was a beautiful lake before it was a town and farmlands. The problem you blame on the Indians was created by white people for white people. Water, in a lake the size of Tule, can be considered plentiful. The water isn't plentiful, along with fish, deer, elk, etc. It was plentiful for over 15,000 years until outsiders showed up. Don't blame Indians. Greed was not our way. That's why it was so easy to move across this land and take it over. Because we are good, generous people. We didn't judge you on your skin color the way you all judged us. We knew we could live on the land together. You fenced it in and sent us to Reservations. We've been in recovery mode since you brought all this to us.

Yeah, you'll say we'd still be living without internet, running water, etc. and where would we be without you. I ain't gonna argue that. Things are the way the are and we're forced to live accordingly.(9-5 jobs, taxes, poverty, and a racist county known as Klamath)

You forget, we don't. "

Decades wrote on Sep 29, 2008 6:34 AM:

" A decent and clean opinion until you get here:

"It seems to be that too much say is given over to Indian tribes and not enough to the general public’s welfare. Perhaps this is due to a lot of cash sloshing around from casinos or perhaps it is due to legal maneuvers and tactics, but the facts on the ground are for keeping the dams, not blowing them up. Electric rates will zoom if these dams are removed."

Then your objectivity dies. "

Chuck wrote on Sep 28, 2008 9:53 AM:

" Very well said, and to the correct objective point !! "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   
You must input the verification code (shown above as a picture) to submit your comments.
This feature stops computer generated advertisements from being posted as comments.
Return to: Letters « | Home « | Top of Page ^

Local Weather