Move the “bucket” from in front of the Government Center?
It’s been suggested previously it should be moved to the Klamath County Museum. The 10-foot tall bucket was put in place Aug. 21, 2001, to protest the federal government cutoff of water on the Klamath Reclamation Project in a historic collision of the legal rights of irrigators, protection of fish protected by the Endangered Species Act and treaty rights of American Indian tribes.
Among the events of that painful year, was the a show of support for irrigators by people from across the nation. An estimated 4,000 people gathered downtown and after a parade of tractors and other vehicles, the bucket was put place.
The events of 2001 put tribal members and non-tribal members on different sides. There’s support to keep the bucket right where it is as a permanent reminder of 2001, but there are also those who believe it’s a constant thumb in the eye of tribal members. And then there are those who don’t think the bucket says much of anything and wonder what it means.
The words on the bucket read:
“Klamath Bucket
Brigade
Elko to Klamath
NV UT ID OR”
Should it stay where it is, or should it join other memorials of Klamath County history at the Klamath County Museum?
— Opinion Editor Pat Bushey
![]() |
|
|
| How tough should the county get on people burning wood in uncertified wood stoves? | How would you prioritize money matters on the Nov. 4 ballot? |
Reader Comments
Brian wrote on Sep 25, 2008 12:07 PM:
Evil Empire wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:18 AM:
Truth wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:07 AM:
I would appreciate you identifying a myth that I have brought to this discussion. I don't think you can.
Name Calling? I was trying to help you out. You are so wrong in anything you say. I thought your head was....anyway.
You brought 'sides' into this. I didn't.
I have taken the requirement to fulfill a Bachelor of Science at the AAU flagship University for the State of Oregon. I won't be taking any grammar classes any time soon.
Terry, you are shunned. I can't argue with someone that can't keep a train of thought. "
Terry wrote on Sep 20, 2008 6:47 PM:
Truth..."Condolences to the family of the man who was beaten to death but what does that have to do with the topic of this thread?"
Terry...Re-read my thread, he was severly beaten, not beaten to death.
Terry...I was comparing it to your reference about the Bonanza men that "came to Chiloquin and shot up the town and cursed the children and got slapped on the hand."
Truth..."embarassing your side."
Terry... Have we now chosen up sides? I was born and raised here also. I know what has happened in the not to distant past. You, need to move on from what has happened in the past. Bind up the old wounds.
You also need to take a course in grammer and punctuation. I did learn that in the 3rd grade. "
plute wrote on Sep 20, 2008 8:15 AM:
Dani wrote on Sep 19, 2008 1:08 PM:
Truth wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:10 AM:
You should really pull your head out before you get on here and vomit the capacity of your intellect, embarassing your 'side'. "
Truth wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:02 AM:
You should really pull your head out before you get on here and vomit the capacity of your intelligence, embarassing your 'side'. "
Terry wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:37 PM:
Truth wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:42 PM:
Terry, did you think about anything I wrote or did you just dismiss it because it isn't what your 3rd grade teacher taught you about Indians?
Terry, is what I said the Truth?
Terry, the discussion on this board was about the significance of the bucket. The significance, according to some, is it's past. So, Mr. Smart Guy that Doesn't Whine, what's your problem with what I wrote? Where am I wrong? What do you have to say that, somewhat, resembles intelligence?
Don't just grunt at your computer and turn it off either. Speak up. Use your brain. Don't resort to name calling, unless you are a 3rd grader. Then, it'll all make sense. "
Sue wrote on Sep 17, 2008 3:10 PM:
Truth wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:15 AM:
If it goes into a museum, the plaque/description should also remind everyone of those Bonanza men that came to Chiloquin and shot the town up, cursed children, and got slapped on the hand.
Maybe Herald & News could go through their archives and find all those Letters to the Editor that had nothing good to say about Indians and put them up next to that bucket too.
See EVERYONE wants to remember their history EXCEPT the negative parts. Non Indians never want to remember Treatys, or Genocide, or biological warfare, or forced sterilization of women, or boarding schools, or forced termination, or racial disparities in sentencing. I could go on and on. You all want to remember the 'good fight' you put up against Indians and the Feds but you can't just pick and choose your history.
We remember, you forgot.
You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. "
Kirk O. wrote on Sep 16, 2008 4:42 PM:
If it were showcased, elsewhere, with a modicum of functionality (I loved Pril's Bucket Park suggestion) then it has a place in the community less unsightly than the wart on downtown that it is today. "
OneChick wrote on Sep 16, 2008 3:21 PM:
Pilar C. wrote on Sep 16, 2008 2:16 PM:
Wetwater wrote on Sep 15, 2008 10:15 AM:
DLO wrote on Sep 12, 2008 7:43 AM:
I remember and understandwemw wrote on Sep 10, 2008 8:22 AM:
Remember the old saying "History repeats itself". If the bucket is taken down people will forget exactly what transpired in the Klamath Basin and it should not be forgotten. Many people apparently already have forgotten or never understood what happened to start with.Basic human liberties were taken from farmers who "owned" their property and adjunct water rights and the federal government tried to stop them from irrigating in the middle of the farming season. For anyone who doesn't understand, farming/ranching is the lifeblood of this area and without it and irrigation we would be no more than Burns or Lakeview,
economically. Farming and ranching is the second largest economic driver in Oregon behind
electronics. Alfalfa and cattle/dairy are worth hundreds of millions to our state's economy. This doesn't even address the Tulelake Basin in California, which depends on this water also and raises millions $ in row crops seasonally.
This bucket does not represent some obtuse idea - it stands for our basic rights and the government's promise/contract with the farmers in the Klamath Project. "
Richard wrote on Sep 9, 2008 6:52 PM:
BP wrote on Sep 9, 2008 4:57 PM:
It shouldn't be on any public property. The best "placement" for the Bucket is the scrapyard. "
Chris P wrote on Sep 9, 2008 4:06 PM:
ken w wrote on Sep 9, 2008 3:38 PM:
That bucket serves as a valuable reminder
that we really must stand for what is right!! "
DONALD wrote on Sep 9, 2008 3:18 PM:
Move It wrote on Sep 9, 2008 12:56 PM:
Linda wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:58 PM:
DD wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:07 AM:
JMR wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:30 PM:
Bev wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:06 PM:
Wary wrote on Sep 7, 2008 4:33 PM:
Diane wrote on Sep 7, 2008 2:34 PM:
To Fireye wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:52 PM:
Fireye wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:18 PM:
Willard B. wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:38 AM:
lee wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:01 AM:
Ekena wrote on Sep 7, 2008 10:58 AM:
pril wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:16 AM:
pete wrote on Sep 6, 2008 6:48 PM:
D.A. wrote on Sep 6, 2008 3:24 PM:
The big picture wrote on Sep 6, 2008 12:15 PM:
It needs some sort of plaque explaining things. And it should be moved to the museum. It's a great opportunity to explain the important, complicated issues involved in Basin water crisis. I know it's really easy to get attached to the way things are, but think about the bigger picture. "
H. wrote on Sep 6, 2008 9:59 AM:
This is not a piece of history to be relegated to a museum - the bucket represents an on going cultural war between the federalization of rural America and the far left environmentalists and their Interior Department followers. "
Ariadne wrote on Sep 6, 2008 9:40 AM:
Louise wrote on Sep 6, 2008 7:19 AM:
Part of History wrote on Sep 6, 2008 7:09 AM:





Beverly wrote on Sep 28, 2008 7:16 PM:
If not why not??
I moved here 2 years ago and my immediate question was why was this allowed - without both sides being represented??
Someone explain this - It would seem to honor both sides of the "argument" which one can only hope will one day be long forgotten. "